DISCO eDiscovery: the per-document model explained
DISCO’s pricing page references a per-document pricing unit but publishes no price figure.
Section
What specific tools do, described from their own documentation.
DISCO’s pricing page references a per-document pricing unit but publishes no price figure.
Everlaw publishes no pricing figure or pricing unit; its pricing page routes buyers to a scheduled meeting, leaving scope, volume, hosting and services to be defined in sales.
Microsoft Purview eDiscovery identifies, preserves, and exports tenant content for external review, but licensing, metadata, scale, and governance require careful planning.
Chat evidence does not arrive as documents: preservation, unit selection, rendering, and protocol design determine whether Slack or Teams data can be reviewed and produced reliably.
Logikcull’s November 2026 pricing page names per-GB and per-month units without publishing figures, making volume, retention and trial design the key evaluation questions.
Nextpoint’s pricing page, checked in November 2026, combines per-user, per-GB and per-document units without publishing figures, making the quoted pricing basis a procurement question.
Relativity’s pricing page lists no figure or pricing unit, routes buyers to sales, and leaves product naming and enterprise deployment questions for current vendor verification.